Rumsfeld warns of Islamic superstate if U.S. leaves Iraq too soon
By Drew Brown
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - If U.S. forces leave too soon, Iraq will become a haven for terrorists and the base of a spreading Islamic superstate that would threaten the rest of the world, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld said Monday.
Speaking at Johns Hopkins University's Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Rumsfeld warned that al-Qaida leaders such as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Osama bin Laden would seize power in the wake of an American withdrawal and turn Iraq into the kind of terrorist safe haven that Afghanistan was before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Moreover, Rumsfeld said: "Iraq would serve as the base of a new Islamic caliphate to extend throughout the Middle East, and which would threaten legitimate governments in Europe, Africa and Asia. This is their plan. They have said so. We make a terrible mistake if we fail to listen and learn."
"The message that retreat would send to the free people of Iraq and to moderate Muslim reformers throughout the region and the world would be that they cannot count on America," Rumsfeld said. "The message it would send to our enemies would be that America will not defend itself against terrorists in Iraq, and it will not defend itself against terrorists anywhere."
The Bush administration has been warning of the dangers of a new caliphate - an Islamic superstate based on Islamic laws with religious and political authority over much of the Muslim world - to bolster waning support for its policy in Iraq.
The message is similar to the domino theory that U.S. officials used 40 years ago to muster support for the Vietnam War by arguing that abandoning South Vietnam would allow the communists to conquer neighboring countries such as Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia.
Much as the original domino theory overlooked the tensions between the Soviet Union and China, the power of nationalism and the appeal of prosperity, Rumsfeld's remarks neglected the deep animosity between Sunni Muslim extremists such as bin Laden and Iraq's Shiite majority. It also discounts the differences among predominately Muslim countries from Morocco to Indonesia.
A Sunni-dominated caliphate is unlikely in Iraq, where Shiites make up 60 percent of the population, said Akbar Ahmed, the chair of Islamic Studies at American University, and a former Pakistani ambassador to the United Kingdom. While fundamentalists on both sides say they like the idea of clerical government, Iraqi Sunnis and Shiites have been fighting one another.
"It's like saying the Christians will be united under one banner," said Ahmed. "It sounds nice, but whose banner will it be?"
Ahmed said he believes that U.S. troops should stay in Iraq, but should pull out of most cities and towns.
If U.S. troops leave Iraq to its fate, the biggest beneficiary of the U.S.-led 2003 invasion could be Iran, Iraq's Shiite neighbor to the east, whose fundamentalist regime Bush four years ago branded as part of an "axis of evil" along with Iraq and North Korea, he said.
"In the present situation, I don't see a caliphate at all. What I do see is a strong Islamic Shiite government in Iraq making overtures to Iran, and that will have long-term implications for U.S. interests in the Middle East," Ahmed said.
Rumsfeld also blamed allegations of paid-for news in Iraq on a private contractor who's "alleged to have written accurate stories, but paid someone in the media in Iraq to carry the story." He didn't address the fact that U.S. military officials in Iraq themselves paid Iraqi journalists to write favorable stories, as Knight Ridder has reported.
In addition, Rumsfeld said that Iraqi security forces were improving. He said that 214,000 Iraqis were "trained and equipped," acknowledging that they have "varying degrees of experience." He added: "Each day and each week and each month that goes by, they gain more experience and more capability."
Iraqi Vice President Ghazi al-Yawer, a Sunni Muslim, however, told The Associated Press on Monday that the training of the Iraqi security forces, which are dominated by Shiite Muslims, has suffered a big setback in the past six months, and that the security forces increasingly are being used to settle old scores and make political gains.
The original caliphate was a period of centralized rule over much of the Muslim world in the early period of Islam. In the seventh and eighth centuries, Arab political and religious leaders in Damascus, then Baghdad, ruled an empire that stretched from Spain to Central Asia.
Establishing a caliphate is al-Qaida's stated purpose, but it's "highly unlikely" that the group will succeed anywhere, said Emily Hunt, a terrorism analyst and a visiting fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. But it's possible that if the U.S. forces withdrew before Iraqi security forces could stand on their own, al-Zarqawi could use a destabilized Iraq to launch more attacks, she said.
Iraqi security forces and Iraq's fledging government, both dominated by majority Shiites, aren't yet capable of fighting insurgents and terrorist groups on their own, said Phebe Marr, an Iraq expert at the United States Institute for Peace.
"The Shiites aren't strong enough to stop this," said Marr, who's been watching Iraq for more than 50 years. "Iraq's government is fragile. Iraq has no police force or military force that can stop this insurgency. So, if you have a failed state, where people have no control, then (terrorists) can operate there."
The United States must stay to train Iraqi security forces and turn control over to them gradually, a process that "is going to take years," Marr said.
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - If U.S. forces leave too soon, Iraq will become a haven for terrorists and the base of a spreading Islamic superstate that would threaten the rest of the world, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld said Monday.
Speaking at Johns Hopkins University's Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Rumsfeld warned that al-Qaida leaders such as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Osama bin Laden would seize power in the wake of an American withdrawal and turn Iraq into the kind of terrorist safe haven that Afghanistan was before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Moreover, Rumsfeld said: "Iraq would serve as the base of a new Islamic caliphate to extend throughout the Middle East, and which would threaten legitimate governments in Europe, Africa and Asia. This is their plan. They have said so. We make a terrible mistake if we fail to listen and learn."
"The message that retreat would send to the free people of Iraq and to moderate Muslim reformers throughout the region and the world would be that they cannot count on America," Rumsfeld said. "The message it would send to our enemies would be that America will not defend itself against terrorists in Iraq, and it will not defend itself against terrorists anywhere."
The Bush administration has been warning of the dangers of a new caliphate - an Islamic superstate based on Islamic laws with religious and political authority over much of the Muslim world - to bolster waning support for its policy in Iraq.
The message is similar to the domino theory that U.S. officials used 40 years ago to muster support for the Vietnam War by arguing that abandoning South Vietnam would allow the communists to conquer neighboring countries such as Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia.
Much as the original domino theory overlooked the tensions between the Soviet Union and China, the power of nationalism and the appeal of prosperity, Rumsfeld's remarks neglected the deep animosity between Sunni Muslim extremists such as bin Laden and Iraq's Shiite majority. It also discounts the differences among predominately Muslim countries from Morocco to Indonesia.
A Sunni-dominated caliphate is unlikely in Iraq, where Shiites make up 60 percent of the population, said Akbar Ahmed, the chair of Islamic Studies at American University, and a former Pakistani ambassador to the United Kingdom. While fundamentalists on both sides say they like the idea of clerical government, Iraqi Sunnis and Shiites have been fighting one another.
"It's like saying the Christians will be united under one banner," said Ahmed. "It sounds nice, but whose banner will it be?"
Ahmed said he believes that U.S. troops should stay in Iraq, but should pull out of most cities and towns.
If U.S. troops leave Iraq to its fate, the biggest beneficiary of the U.S.-led 2003 invasion could be Iran, Iraq's Shiite neighbor to the east, whose fundamentalist regime Bush four years ago branded as part of an "axis of evil" along with Iraq and North Korea, he said.
"In the present situation, I don't see a caliphate at all. What I do see is a strong Islamic Shiite government in Iraq making overtures to Iran, and that will have long-term implications for U.S. interests in the Middle East," Ahmed said.
Rumsfeld also blamed allegations of paid-for news in Iraq on a private contractor who's "alleged to have written accurate stories, but paid someone in the media in Iraq to carry the story." He didn't address the fact that U.S. military officials in Iraq themselves paid Iraqi journalists to write favorable stories, as Knight Ridder has reported.
In addition, Rumsfeld said that Iraqi security forces were improving. He said that 214,000 Iraqis were "trained and equipped," acknowledging that they have "varying degrees of experience." He added: "Each day and each week and each month that goes by, they gain more experience and more capability."
Iraqi Vice President Ghazi al-Yawer, a Sunni Muslim, however, told The Associated Press on Monday that the training of the Iraqi security forces, which are dominated by Shiite Muslims, has suffered a big setback in the past six months, and that the security forces increasingly are being used to settle old scores and make political gains.
The original caliphate was a period of centralized rule over much of the Muslim world in the early period of Islam. In the seventh and eighth centuries, Arab political and religious leaders in Damascus, then Baghdad, ruled an empire that stretched from Spain to Central Asia.
Establishing a caliphate is al-Qaida's stated purpose, but it's "highly unlikely" that the group will succeed anywhere, said Emily Hunt, a terrorism analyst and a visiting fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. But it's possible that if the U.S. forces withdrew before Iraqi security forces could stand on their own, al-Zarqawi could use a destabilized Iraq to launch more attacks, she said.
Iraqi security forces and Iraq's fledging government, both dominated by majority Shiites, aren't yet capable of fighting insurgents and terrorist groups on their own, said Phebe Marr, an Iraq expert at the United States Institute for Peace.
"The Shiites aren't strong enough to stop this," said Marr, who's been watching Iraq for more than 50 years. "Iraq's government is fragile. Iraq has no police force or military force that can stop this insurgency. So, if you have a failed state, where people have no control, then (terrorists) can operate there."
The United States must stay to train Iraqi security forces and turn control over to them gradually, a process that "is going to take years," Marr said.
posted by Hanan Elbadry at 8:50 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home